Pritchard v. Smith
| Clinton Lee Pritchard |
| Fred Smith, Leanne Sheppard and Lindy Fagen Houston |
| 3:2019cv00167 |
| May 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Pamela L Reeves |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 (Case at Issue) NOTICE of Availability of Magistrate Judge (copy mailed to Clinton Lee Pritchard #485740, MCCX, PO Box 2000, Wartburg, TN 37887) (AYB) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Fred Smith.(Lorch, Pamela) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Fred Smith. (original and one copy of summons, USM-285 and copy of Complaint forwarded to USMS) (JBR) |
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff is ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. Signed by District Judge Pamela L Reeves on 5/22/19. (copy mailed to Clinton Pritchard at Morgan County along with service packet, custodian of inmate accounts and TN Attorney General; copy forwarded to Court's Financial Deputy) (JBR)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Clinton Lee Pritchard. (JBR, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clinton Lee Pritchard. (JBR, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Clinton Lee Pritchard. (Attachments: #1 Other Cover Letter & Envelope)(JBR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
