Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC v. King Distilling Co. LLC (JRG2)
| Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC |
| King Distilling Co. LLC |
| 3:2019cv00178 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| J Ronnie Greer |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 APPLICATION for Clerk's Default as to King Distilling Co. LLC by Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC. Party is instructed to email the proposed default to the clerk at the appropriate email address in accordance with #http://www.tned.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/civil_forms. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit in Support of Request for Entry of Default, #2 Other Proposed Entry of Default)(Googe, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC. All Defendants. (Googe, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 PATENT AND TRADEMARK NOTICE in compliance with 35 USC 290 and/or 15 USC 1116 regarding 4069788, 5141616, 5087832, 5501671, 5501669, 4069789, 5029462, 5111844, 5745967, 5141733, 4096942, 4088878, 4092396, 4106507, 4180903, 4580363 . (Googe, Matthew) |
Filing 7
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 05/16/2019. (AMP)
|
|
Filing 6
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 05/16/2019. (AMP)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 05/16/2019. (AMP)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to King Distilling Co. LLC. (AMP) |
| Filing 3 Administrative Notice to Counsel #1 Complaint: Please refile the Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark using the event Patent and Trademark Notice under Other Documents. Requirements due by 5/21/2019. (AMP) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Ole Smoky HoldCo, LLC for Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC. (Googe, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-3974148.), filed by Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Other Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark)(Googe, Matthew) |
| District Judge J Ronnie Greer and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (AMP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC v. King Distilling Co. LLC (JRG2) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: King Distilling Co. LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ole Smoky Distillery, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael E Robinson |
| Represented By: | Matthew M Googe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
