Anderson v. Hudle et al
Prentice Farrell Anderson |
Logan Gibbson, Samantha Starkey, Stanton Hudle and CO Silmas |
3:2019cv00281 |
July 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
H Bruce Guyton |
Thomas A Varlan |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Logan Gibbson and forwarded to the Marshal for service. (ABF) |
Filing 10 Administrative Notice to Prentice F. Anderson: Requirements due by 8/28/2019. No summons received with the Marshal 285 form. (ABF) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Marshal Form 285 by Prentice Farrell Anderson (No summons received) (ABF) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Plaintiff's MOTION #7 to Amend #4 Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiffs claim that Defendant Logan Gibbson subjected him to excessive force shall PROCEED. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a service packet for Defendant Gibbson. Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete the service packet and return it to the Clerks Office within thirty (30) days of entry of this memorandum and order. Defendants Stanton Hudle and Samantha Starkey are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/12/19. (ABF) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Amend/Revise #4 Complaint by Prentice Farrell Anderson. (ABF) |
Filing 6 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Prentice Farrell Anderson. Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #1 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel #5 is DENIED. Plaintiff is ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this memorandum and order to the custodian of inmate accounts at the institution where Plaintiff is now confined, to the Attorney General for the State of Tennessee, and to the Courts financial deputy. Plaintiffs claim that Defendant(s) subjected him to excessive force shall PROCEED. Plaintiffs remaining claims are DISMISSED. Defendants Silmas, Robinson, Spurlock, and John Doe 3 are DISMISSED. Within twenty (20) days of entry of this order, Plaintiff SHALL file an amended complaint identifying the Defendant(s) who used a stun gun against him and handcuffed him on January 28, 2019. Plaintiffs amendment MUST NOT include any additional claims or discuss matters dismissed by this order. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 7/24/19. (c/m to Prentice Farrell Anderson #408307, MORGAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, PO BOX 2000, WARTBURG, TN 37887; the Custodian of Inmate Accounts at Morgan County Correctional and the Attorney General for the State of TN)(ABF) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Prentice Farrell Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Other Envelope)(ABF) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Prentice Farrell Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Other Envelope)(ABF) |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (c/m to Prentice Farrell Anderson #408307, MORGAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, PO BOX 2000, WARTBURG, TN 37887) (ABF) |
Filing 2 Administrative Notice to Pro Se Plaintiff: Requirements due by 8/19/2019. We have received your in forma pauperis application but a complaint was not included. Please complete the enclosed form and return to the Clerk's Office. (c/m to Prentice Farrell Anderson #408307, MORGAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, PO BOX 2000, WARTBURG, TN 37887)(ABF) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Prentice Farrell Anderson. (ABF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.