Martin v. Murfreesboro, TN et al
Marques D Martin |
Rutherford County, TN and Murfreesboro, TN |
3:2019cv00293 |
August 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
H Bruce Guyton |
Harry S Mattice |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from Tennessee Eastern has been opened in Middle District of Tennessee as case 3:19-cv-00664, filed 08/06/2019. (KMK) |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer this action to the Nashville Division of the Middle District of Tennessee and CLOSE this Court's file.Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 8/2/19. (AWS) Mailed to Marques Martin. |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Clerk will be DIRECTED to transfer this action to the Nashville Division of the Middle District of Tennessee and CLOSE this Court's file. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 8/2/19. (AWS)Mailed to Marques Martin. |
Case transferred to District of Middle District of Tennessee. (AWS) |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (c/m to Marques D Martin, 5629 Jamaica Lane, Knoxville, TN 37921) (ABF) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Murfreesboro, TN, Rutherford County, TN, filed by Marques D Martin. (Attachments: #1 Other Envelope)(ABF) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marques D Martin. (Attachments: #1 Other Envelope)(ABF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.