Rendina v. Seals et al
3:2019cv00421 |
November 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Knoxville Office |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 JUDGMENT ORDER,Plaintiff's motion to dismiss his complaint 21 is GRANTED, and this pro se prisoner's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Further, the Court CERTIFIES that any appeal taken from this decision would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 3/30/20. (c/m) (ADA) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and denying 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Defendants Seals, l/n/u Joe, and f/n/u Ballard are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Va rlan on 11/19/19. (copy mailed to Anthony Rendina along with service packet at Sevier County Jail, copy mailed to custodian of inmate accounts at Sevier County Jail, copy mailed to the TN Attorney General and copy forwarded to Court's financial deputy) (JBR) Modified text on 11/19/2019 (ADA). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rendina v. Seals et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.