Abercrombie v. BR Agency, Inc. d/b/a Giles Industries, Inc. et al
Rebekah Abercrombie |
Clayton Home Building Group, d/b/a CMH Services, Inc., BR Agency, Inc. d/b/a Giles Industries, Inc., Clayton Home Building Group and BR Agency, Inc. |
3:2019cv00453 |
November 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
H Bruce Guyton |
Harry S Mattice |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rebekah Abercrombie. Clayton Home Building Group served on 12/17/2019. (Burkhalter, David) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rebekah Abercrombie. BR Agency, Inc. served on 12/17/2019. (Burkhalter, David) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to BR Agency, Inc., Clayton Home Building Group. (Attachments: #1 Summons Clayton Home)(SAC) |
District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr and Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton added. (SAC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BR Agency, Inc. d/b/a Giles Industries, Inc., Clayton Home Building Group, d/b/a CMH Services, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-4127154.), filed by Rebekah Abercrombie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Summons BR Agency, Inc. d/b/a Giles Industries, Inc., #10 Summons Clayton Home Building Group, d/b/a CMH Services, Inc., #11 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Burkhalter, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.