Stoneking v. World Choice Investments, LLC et al (TV2)
| Samantha K Stoneking |
| World Choice Investments, LLC and Charlie King |
| 3:2020cv00207 |
| May 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 05/13/2020. (AMP)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 05/13/2020. (AMP)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 05/13/2020. (AMP)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Charlie King and World Choice Investments, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Charlie King) (AMP) |
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT by Samantha Stoneking. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Notice of Right to Sue)(Friauf, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charlie King, World Choice Investments, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNEDC-4340446.), filed by Samantha Stoneking. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons World Choice Investments, LLC, #3 Summons Charlie King)(Friauf, James) |
| District Judge Thomas A Varlan and Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton added. (AMP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
