Davis v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al (TV1)
Wilma Jean Davis |
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Re-Bath Mid-South, LLC |
3:2020cv00226 |
May 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Debra C Poplin |
Thomas A Varlan |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 05/28/2020. (CAT) |
Filing 5 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 05/28/2020. (CAT) |
Filing 4 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 05/28/2020. (CAT) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Re-Bath Mid-South, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Re-Bath Mid-South, LLC) (CAT) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Deficiency (Pro Hac). Attorney Volney Brand is not admitted (See LR 83.5). This matter will be referred to a magistrate judge if a pro hac motion is not filed within 15 days of this Notice. (CAT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., RE-BATH MID-SOUTH, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNEDC-4355881.), filed by Wilma Jean Davis. (Attachments: #1 Summons - summons to be issued, #2 Summons - summons to be issued, #3 Other - Civil Cover Sheet)(Montpelier, Dale) |
District Judge Thomas A Varlan and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (CAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.