Clark-Bey v. City of Knoxville et al
Christopher L Clark-Bey |
Tom Spangler, Charme P Allen, Preston Whillock, Steven W Sword and City of Knoxville |
3:2020cv00367 |
August 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Clifton L Corker |
Debra C Poplin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 JUDGMENT ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. The custodian of Plaintiff's inmate trust account is DIRECTED to submit the filing fee to the Clerk in the manner set forth. This action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915(A). Signed by District Judge Clifton L. Corker on 8/20/20. (c/m)(ADA) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION in support of the following Judgment Order. Signed by District Judge Clifton L. Corker on 8/20/20. (c/m Christopher L Clark-Bey 390446 NECX 5249 Highway 67 West P.O. Box 5000 Mountain City, TN 37683-5000, custodian of inmate accounts and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee)(ADA) |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (copy mailed to Christopher L Clark-Bey at NECX) (JBR) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher L Clark-Bey. (JBR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christopher L Clark-Bey.(JBR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.