Muszik et al v. Acuity Mutual Insurance Company
Carol Muszik and Jerry Muszik |
Acuity Mutual Insurance Company |
3:2020cv00377 |
August 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Clifton L Corker |
Debra C Poplin |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 12 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company (Miller, Cory) |
Filing 11 Notice of Attorney Withdrawal Attorney Elijah C. Lovingfoss terminated. (Lovingfoss, Elijah) |
|
|
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- The Policy)(Miller, Cory) |
|
|
|
Filing 4 Administrative Notice to Counsel #3 Notice (Other) : INFORMATIONAL ONLY. For future reference, please file Civil Cover Sheets in a non-fillable format. (CAT) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Cory) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. (Miller, Cory) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sevier County Chancery Court, case number 20-7-133. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNEDC-4459001), filed by Acuity Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -- State Court Complaint)(Miller, Cory) |
District Judge Clifton L Corker and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (CAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.