Brown v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
Plaintiff: Amanda Rhea Brown
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 3:2020cv00468
Filed: November 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: H Bruce Guyton
Referring Judge: Thomas A Varlan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on U.S. Attorney's Office on 11/16/2020, Office of the Regional Chief Counsel on 11/16/2020, and United States Attorney General on 11/17/2020, filed by Amanda Rhea Brown. (Palmer, Melissa)
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, Commissioner of. (JBR)
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 11/10/20. (JBR)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You MUST register as an E-Filer here: #https://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/pscof/regWizard.jsf. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 11/05/2020. (This entry constitutes the complete order of the Court.) (JTS)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 90 receipt number ATNEDC-4542502.) by Amanda Rhea Brown. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Palmer, Melissa)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Amanda Rhea Brown. (Palmer, Melissa)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 SSA COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, filed by Amanda Rhea Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons)(Palmer, Melissa)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Clerk's Verification of PHV Requirements is complete regarding document: #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 90 receipt number ATNEDC-4542502.) filed by Amanda Rhea Brown . (AMP)
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order District Judge Thomas A Varlan and Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton added. (AMP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Rhea Brown
Represented By: Melissa A Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?