Hiles v. Jefferson Operator, LLC
| Amber Hiles |
| Jefferson Operator, LLC and Jefferson Operator, LLC doing business as Jefferson City Health and Rehabilitation Center |
| 3:2020cv00533 |
| December 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Clifton L Corker |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Jefferson Operator, LLC. (JBR) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT Summons to be Issued to Jefferson Operator, LLC by Amber Hiles. (Friauf, James) |
Filing 4
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 12/21/2020. (AML)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 12/21/2020. (AML)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 12/21/2020. (AML)
|
| District Judge Clifton L Corker and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (AML) |
| No summons received with initiating documents. Therefore, summons not issued as to Jefferson Operator, LLC. (AML) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jefferson Operator, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BTNEDC-4593304.), filed by Amber Hiles. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Friauf, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
