Grindle et al v. Daughtery et al
| Michael Wade Grindle and Charles Schuiten |
| Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency and Bradley Daughtery |
| 3:2021cv00038 |
| February 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Clifton L Corker |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Bradley Daughtery(Individually), Bradley Daughtery(in his Official Capacity as a Tennessee Wildlife Resource Officer), Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency. (Attachments: #1 Summons Tennessee Wildlife Resrouce Agency) (CAT) |
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 02/05/2021. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 02/05/2021. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 02/05/2021. (CAT)
|
| District Judge Clifton L Corker and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (CAT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-4645695.), filed by Michael Wade Grindle, Charles Schuiten. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Shett, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Looper, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
