McCommon v. Robinson et al
| Elton McCommon |
| Brandon Robinson, B Lopez, Corp Brown, Mike Parris and Officer Morgan |
| 3:2021cv00355 |
| October 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Clifton L Corker |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER. Plaintiff has not paid the required $400.00 filing fee, nor has he submitted the proper documents to proceed in forma pauperis. Specifically, Plaintiff has not filed a certified copy of his inmate trust account for the previous six-month period. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to pay the full filing fee or to submit the necessary documents. Signed by District Judge Clifton L. Corker on 10/21/21. (c/m Elton McCommon 92739 MORGAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX Post Office Box 2000 WARTBURG, TN 37887 with account form)(ADA)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (ADA)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Corp Brown, B Lopez, Officer Morgan, Mike Parris, Brandon Robinson, filed by Elton McCommon. (Attachments: #1 BPR letter, #2 Chaplan letter, #3 DOJ letter)(ADA)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elton McCommon. (ADA)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
