Swanson v. Boyd
Petitioner: Nathan L Swanson, Jr
Respondent: Bert Boyd
Case Number: 3:2021cv00383
Filed: November 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Charles E Atchley
Referring Judge: H Bruce Guyton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Bert Boyd.(Bolduc, Nicholas)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING w/certificate of service and INDEX OF RECORD of Rule 5 materials submitted by Attorney General Nicholas S. Bolduc containing 10 volumes of transcript. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Technical Record on Criminal Proceedings, #2 Exhibit Supplemental Technical Record on Criminal Proceedings, #3 Exhibit Transcript of Motion to Set Aside Guilty Plea on Criminal Proceedings, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 1 on Transcript of Motion to Set Aside on Criminal Proceedings, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 2 on Transcript of Motion to Set Aside Guilty Plea on Criminal Proceedings, #6 Exhibit Brief of Appellant on Criminal Proceedings, #7 Exhibit Brief of State on Criminal Proceedings, #8 Exhibit Opinion of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals on Criminal Proceedings, #9 Exhibit Application for Discretionary Review on Criminal Proceedings, #10 Exhibit Order Denying Discretionary Review on Criminal Proceedings)(Bolduc, Nicholas)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas S Bolduc on behalf of Bert Boyd (Bolduc, Nicholas)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. As it appears from Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #5 that he is unable to pay the filing fee, this motion is GRANTED. Respondent is hereby ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond to the petition within sixty days of the date of this order. Signed by District Judge Charles E. Atchley, Jr. on 11/15/21. (c/m Nathan L Swanson, Jr 524248 NECX 5249 Highway 67 West P.O. Box 5000 Mountain City, TN 37683-5000(ADA)
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John H Bledsoe, III on behalf of Bert Boyd (Bledsoe, John)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (c/m to Nathan L Swanson, Jr #524248, NECX, 5249 Highway 67 West, P.O. Box 5000, Mountain City, TN 37683-5000) (ABF)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nathan L Swanson, Jr. (ABF)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nathan L Swanson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Other Envelope)(ABF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Swanson v. Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nathan L Swanson, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bert Boyd
Represented By: John H Bledsoe, III
Represented By: Nicholas S Bolduc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?