Gehling v. Sliager et al
| Seth Gehling |
| Billy Sliager, Ricky Oaks and Jefferson County Sheriffs Department |
| 3:2021cv00400 |
| November 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| H Bruce Guyton |
| Travis R McDonough |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Seth Gehling. (ABF)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter from Seth Gehling requesting another IFP Application (c/m to Seth Gehling, JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, P O BOX 1108, DANDRIDGE, TN 37725) (ABF)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER, the Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a form motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and Plaintiff is ORDERED to return a completed and signed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order. Signed by District Judge Travis R. McDonough on 11/30/21. (c/m Seth Gehling JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT P O BOX 1108 DANDRIDGE, TN 37725 with ifp form) (ADA)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (c/m to Seth Gehling, JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, P O BOX 1108, DANDRIDGE, TN 37725) (ABF)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Seth Gehling. (ABF)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Seth Gehling.(ABF)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
