Reed v. M3K, LLC et al
| Christopher Reed |
| M3K, LLC and Dominic Pitarro |
| 3:2022cv00175 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Katherine A Crytzer |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number K3044866 (ABF) |
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information,Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 5/19/2022. (BJL)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss,Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 5/19/2022. (BJL)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions, Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 5/19/2022. (BJL)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to M3K, LLC, Dominic Pitarro. (BJL) |
| District Judge Katherine A Crytzer and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (BJL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Trial Demanded against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402.), filed by Christopher Reed. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent to be a Party Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons M3K, LLC, #4 Summons Dominic Pitarro)(Forester, Jesse) |
| Pursuant to a phone call from attorney for the Plaintiff, he was not given the opportunity to make a payment for the filing fee in ECF. He is mailing in a paper check for the filing fee to the Knoxville Clerk's Office. (AYB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
