Doe v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
Jane Doe |
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Group Corporation |
3:2022cv00212 |
June 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Clifton L Corker |
Jill E McCook |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #2 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Jane Doe. (Ellis, Hudson) |
Filing 15 ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the following dates are set in this cause: See Order for details. Motions for Summary Judgment due by 3/3/2023. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 8/2/2022. (LCK) |
Filing 14 ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 7/28/22. (Attachments: #1 Other Notice of Consent/Non-Consent) (ABF) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #2 MOTION for Protective Order and to Proceed under Pseudonym filed by Unum Group Corporation, Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Williams, James) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Unum Group Corporation, Unum Life Insurance Company of America.(Williams, James) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Unum Life Insurance Company of America served on 6/21/2022 through the TN Dept of Commerce and Insurance. (ABF) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 MOTION for Protective Order. Based upon the lack of opposition from Plaintiff, Defendants shall have up to and including July 28, 2022, in which to file their response to Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook on 07/01/2022. (This entry constitutes the complete Order of the Court.) (JPT) |
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 MOTION for Protective Order by Unum Group Corporation, Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Williams, James) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Unum Group Corporation, Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Williams, James) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION for Additional Time to Respond to Complaint by Unum Group Corporation, Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Williams, James) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Unum Group Corporation, Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Unum Group Summons)(SAC) |
District Judge Clifton L Corker and Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook added. (SAC) |
Filing 5 SEALED Proposed Sealed Document re: #4 MOTION for Leave to File Document Under Seal by Jane Doe . (Ellis, Hudson) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to File Document Under Seal by Jane Doe. (Ellis, Hudson) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #2 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Jane Doe. (Ellis, Hudson) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Protective Order by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ellis, Hudson) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Unum Group Corporation, Unum Life Insurance Company of America ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-5083937.), filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - ID Director Scorecards, #2 Exhibit 2 - Weekly Tracking Report, #3 Exhibit 3 - Justin Deposition non-confidential (redacted), #4 Civil Coversheet, #5 Summons Summons for Unum Group, #6 Summons Summons for Unum Life Insurance Company of America)(Ellis, Hudson) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.