Thompson v. Moore et al
Plaintiff: Davide Thompson
Defendant: C/O Moore, C/O Cutter and Sgt. Munsey
Case Number: 3:2022cv00252
Filed: July 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Crytzer
Referring Judge: Debra C Poplin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 . Because Plaintiff is a prisoner, he is ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. The custodian of Plaintiffs inmate trust account is DIRECTED to submit payments as set forth. Signed by District Judge Katherine A. Crytzer on 9/6/22. (c/m Davide Thompson 550424 BLEDSOE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX 1045 HORSEHEAD ROAD PIKEVILLE, TN 37367 and custodian of inmate accounts)(ADA)
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INMATE TRUST FUND ACCOUNT by Davide Thompson re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ABF)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER, Plaintiff failed to file a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the previous six-month period, or the institutional equivalent [See Doc. 2 at 3]. Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order to pay the full filing fee or to submit the necessary documents. Signed by District Judge Katherine A. Crytzer on 7/27/22. (c/m Davide Thompson 550424 BLEDSOE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX 1045 HORSEHEAD ROAD PIKEVILLE, TN 37367 with trust account statement form)(ADA)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (served by mail to Davide Thompson 550424 BLEDSOE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX 1045 HORSEHEAD ROAD PIKEVILLE, TN 37367) (JBR)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Davide Thompson. (JBR)
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Davide Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Other Envelope, #2 Other Summons and 285 Forms)(JBR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Moore et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Davide Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C/O Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C/O Cutter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt. Munsey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?