Long v. Blount County (TV1)
| David Blake Long |
| Blount County and Blount County, Tennessee |
| 3:2022cv00284 |
| August 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Jill E McCook |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Winningham Keith on behalf of David Blake Long (Keith, Sarah) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Blount County, Tennessee. (ABF) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint Summons for Blount County by David Blake Long. (Evans, Nathaniel) (Main Document 5 replaced on 9/9/2022 with flattened pdf) (ABF). |
Filing 4
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/19/2022. (AWS)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/19/2022. (AWS)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 8/19/2022. (AWS)
|
| District Judge Thomas A Varlan and Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook added. (AWS) |
| No summons received with initiating documents. Therefore, summons not issued as to Blount County, Tennessee. (AWS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Blount County ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-5145891.), filed by David Blake Long. (Attachments: #1 Other)(Evans, Nathaniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
