Lawson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG3)
Plaintiff: JODI LAWSON
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 3:2022cv00351
Filed: October 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: J Ronnie Greer
Referring Judge: Cynthia R Wyrick
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Ridgell-Boltz on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (Ridgell-Boltz, Laura)
October 17, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Ridgell-Boltz on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (Ridgell-Boltz, Laura)
October 12, 2022 Clerk's Verification of PHV Requirements is complete regarding document: #2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 90 receipt number ATNEDC-5188320.) filed by Jodi Lawson (JBR)
October 12, 2022 District Judge J Ronnie Greer and Magistrate Judge Cynthia R Wyrick added. (JBR)
October 11, 2022 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by JODI LAWSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Konoski, Bryan)
October 6, 2022 Filing 3 Administrative Notice to Counsel Bryan Konoski re: #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis : Requirements due by 10/11/2022. Please file the complaint separately from the In Forma Pauperis application.Please attach the summons and civil cover sheet as exhibits to the complaint(ABF)
October 5, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 90 receipt number ATNEDC-5188320.) by JODI LAWSON. (Konoski, Bryan)
October 5, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JODI LAWSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summonses)(Konoski, Bryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lawson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JODI LAWSON
Represented By: Bryan Konoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Represented By: Laura Ridgell-Boltz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?