Fuller v. JTEKT North America Corporation
Edward Fuller |
JTEKT North America Corporation |
3:2023cv00029 |
January 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Katherine A Crytzer |
Jill E McCook |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 16 INFORMATIONAL ONLY - Administrative Notice to Counsel re #14 Response: Wrong event used. The appropriate event for filing the consent/nonconsent form is found under Other Filings/Notices/Notice of Consent/Nonconsent. (JBR) |
Filing 15 Now before the Court is Defendants Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint [Doc. 11]. Defendant seeks until April 6, 2023, to respond to the Complaint so that the parties may have sufficient time to gather and review relevant records and consider resolution. For good cause shown, and given the lack of opposition, the Court GRANTS the motion [Doc. 11]. Defendant SHALL respond to the Complaint on or before April 6, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill E. McCook on 3/10/2023. (This entry constitutes the complete Order of the Court.)(HSN) |
Filing 14 Notice of Nonconsent (Nelson, Lucille) Modified text on 3/10/2023 (JBR). |
|
Filing 12 Certificate of Corporate Interest by JTEKT North America Corporation. (Nelson, Lucille) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by JTEKT North America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Other Proposed Order)(Nelson, Lucille) |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Nelson, Lucille) |
|
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edward Fuller. JTEKT North America Corporation served on 2/2/2023. (McCown, John) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint "Local Rule 12.1 Stipulation" by JTEKT North America Corporation. (Nelson, Lucille) Modified on 2/17/2023 to term motion. This filing is not a motion (AYB). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lucille Lattimore Nelson on behalf of JTEKT North America Corporation (Nelson, Lucille) |
|
|
|
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to JTEKT North America Corporation. (CAT) |
District Judge Katherine A Crytzer and Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook added. (CAT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Edward Fuller against JTEKT North America Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-5279171.), filed by Edward Fuller. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(McCown, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fuller v. JTEKT North America Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Edward Fuller | |
Represented By: | John Robert McCown |
Represented By: | R Scott Jackson, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JTEKT North America Corporation | |
Represented By: | Lucille Lattimore Nelson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.