Byrd v. Fitz
| George John Byrd |
| State of TN, Dept of Corrections and Johnny Fitz |
| 3:2023cv00067 |
| February 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Clifton L Corker |
| Jill E McCook |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER. Petitioner's motion to appoint counsel #2 is DENIED. Respondent is ORDERED to file the state court record and an answer or other response to the petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Signed by District Judge Clifton L. Corker on 3/7/23. (c/m George John Byrd 337070 WEST TENNESSEE STATE PENITENTIARY P.O. Box 1150 Henning, TN 38041 ) (ADA)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by John H Bledsoe, III on behalf of State of TN, Dept of Corrections (Bledsoe, John)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address. (served by mail to George John Byrd 337070 WEST TENNESSEE STATE PENITENTIARY P.O. Box 1150 Henning, TN 38041) (JBR)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by George John Byrd. (JBR)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by George John Byrd. (Filing fee $5.00, Receipt #300001288) (Attachments: #1 Other Attachment 1, #2 Other Attachment 2)(JBR) Modified text on 2/23/2023 (JBR).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
