Rouse v. Hancock County Sheriff Department (PSLC2)
Petitioner: Marty Ray Rouse
Respondent: Hancock County Sheriff Department
Case Number: 3:2023cv00109
Filed: March 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Jill E McCook
Referring Judge: Thomas A Varlan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT ORDER, Petitioners federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and all pending motions are DENIED. A certificate of appealability from this decision is DENIED. Further, because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum Opinion that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, should Petitioner file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 5/16/23. (c/m Martin Ray Rouse 1234 Southern Hollow Road Sneedville, TN 37869) (ADA)
May 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION in support of the following Judgment Order. Signed by District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 5/16/23. (c/m Martin Ray Rouse 1234 Southern Hollow Road Sneedville, TN 37869)(ADA)
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION of Emergency Release filed by petitioner's wife, Jennifer Rouse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(ADA)
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER, Petitioner is ORDERED to fully complete and personally sign the 2254 form and return it to the Court within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 4/4/23. (c/m Martin Ray Rouse 1234 Southern Hollow Road Sneedville, TN 37869 with 2254 form and Hancock County Jail 265 New Jail St, Sneedville, TN 37869) (ADA)(ADA) (Main Document 3 replaced on 4/4/2023) (ADA).
March 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (mailed to Mr. Rouse c/o 1234 Southern Hollow Rd, Sneedville 37869) (AYB)
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Marty Ray Rouse. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part 1, #2 Exhibit Part 2, #3 Exhibit Part 3)(AYB)
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order District Judge Thomas A Varlan and Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook added. (AYB)
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order DVD received with Petition in the Clerk's Office and forwarded to PLU (AYB) Modified on 3/29/2023 to note Paper filings and DVD placed in PLU file room (ADA).
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing fee in the amount of $ 5 (receipt number 300001482) received from Jennifer Rouse (AYB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rouse v. Hancock County Sheriff Department (PSLC2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marty Ray Rouse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Hancock County Sheriff Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?