Keesee, v. AMEX Assurance Company (JRG2)
Elizabeth F. Keesee, as Executrix of the Estate of Homer Dale Keesee and Elizabeth F. Keesee |
AMEX Assurance Company d/b/a AMEX Assurance and AMEX Assurance Company doing business as AMEX Assurance Company |
3:2023cv00133 |
April 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
J Ronnie Greer |
Debra C Poplin |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Shepherd, Charles) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT by AMEX Assurance Company (Shepherd, Charles) |
|
|
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by AMEX Assurance Company d/b/a AMEX Assurance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Policy)(Shepherd, Charles) |
|
|
|
Filing 2 NOTICE by AMEX Assurance Company d/b/a AMEX Assurance to Adverse Party of Removal and Certification of Notice to State Court Clerk (Shepherd, Charles) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Washington County Chancery Court, case number 23-cv-0180. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-5348496), filed by AMEX Assurance Company d/b/a AMEX Assurance. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint and Amended Complaint, #2 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Shepherd, Charles) |
District Judge J Ronnie Greer and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.