Bell v. LMAP Limited
Plaintiff: Pam Bell
Defendant: LMAP Limited
Case Number: 3:2023cv00398
Filed: November 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Clifton L Corker
Referring Judge: Debra C Poplin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2023 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pam Bell. LMAP Limited served on 11/17/2023. (Stephenson, Davis)
November 13, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE re IFP Service (Attorney Representation) re #8 Summons Issued (AYB)
November 13, 2023 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to LMAP Limited. (AYB)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ON APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES. IT IS ORDERED that the application is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that the clerk issue summons and the United States Marshal, or the plaintiff, shall serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order upon all defendant(s) as directed by the plaintiff. If the United States Marshal provides the service, all costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. If the plaintiff provides his/her own service, the plaintiff will bear his/her own costs. Plaintiff is hereby put ON NOTICE that failure to serve the defendant(s) in the time required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) may result in this action being dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin on November 13, 2023. (AYB)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 11/13/23. (JBR)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 11/13/23. (JBR)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Clifton L Corker on 11/13/23. (JBR)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: The Court finds that these cases arise out of the same transaction or occurrence and involve one or more of the same parties. Therefore, these cases are related. Related cases: Create association to 3:22-cv-00035-DCLC-DCP. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin on 11/13/23. (JBR)
November 13, 2023 District Judge Clifton L Corker and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (JBR)
November 9, 2023 Case has been sent to Judge Poplin's Chambers for a related case determination. (CAT)
November 8, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Pam Bell. (Hutto, Rebecca)
November 8, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LMAP Limited, filed by Pam Bell. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Business Entity Disclosure, #3 Supplement Summons)(Hutto, Rebecca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell v. LMAP Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pam Bell
Represented By: Rebecca Hutto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LMAP Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?