Janous v. Aramark Corporation
| Frank Donald Janous |
| Aramark Corporation a/k/a Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Corporation and Aramark Services, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00465 |
| December 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Charles E Atchley |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint. Responses due by 3/4/2024. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 2/26/2024. (DCB)
|
| Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by Aramark Corporation. (Martin, Sean) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT to Magistrate Judge by Aramark Corporation (Martin, Sean) |
| NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE Consent/Non-Consent to Magistrate Judge as required by prior court order (ABF) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. For good cause shown and due to lack of opposition, the motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall have up to and through February 26, 2024, to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. No document is attached. This entry constitutes the complete Order of the Court. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 1/26/2024. (JRT)
|
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Aramark Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Other Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time)(Martin, Sean) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by Aramark Corporation. (Martin, Sean) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Citizenship by Aramark Corporation. (Martin, Sean) |
| Filing 8 Administrative Notice to Counsel Jeffrey Cranford requirements due by 1/8/2024. (CNC)Mailed to Atty Cranford at 550 Main Street, Bank of America Center, 4th Floor, Knoxville, TN 37902 (CNC) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 1/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent/Non-consent) (CNC)
|
|
Filing 6
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 1/2/2024. (CNC)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 1/2/2024. (CNC)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 1/2/2024. (CNC)
|
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, with Signatures by Aramark Corporation. (Martin, Sean) |
| NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE Certificate of Citizenship in a diversity case as required by FRCP 7.1 by Aramark Corporation. (CNC) |
| District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (CNC) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Aramark Corporation a/k/a Aramark Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Aramark Educational Group, LLC for Aramark Corporation a/k/a Aramark Services, Inc.. (Martin, Sean) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Knox County Circuit Court, case number 1-342-23. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNEDC-5554934), filed by Aramark Corporation a/k/a Aramark Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Pleadings from State Court, #2 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
