Gerhart v. Capital One Bank (USA), National Association et al
| Candis Gerhart |
| Capital One Bank (USA), National Association and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 3:2024cv00017 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Debra C Poplin |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 01/19/2024. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 01/19/2024. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 01/19/2024. (CAT)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Equifax Information Services, LLC) (CAT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Candis Gerhart FCRA against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BTNEDC-5570828.), filed by Candis Gerhart. (Attachments: #1 Other civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Summons Capital One, #8 Summons Equifax)(Swan, Philip) |
| District Judge Thomas A Varlan and Magistrate Judge Debra C Poplin added. (CAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
