Moore v. Leeds
Petitioner: Corey Lee Moore
Respondent: Warden Chance Leeds
Case Number: 3:2024cv00051
Filed: February 7, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: J Ronnie Greer
Referring Judge: Jill E McCook
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT ORDER re #5 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Because there are no other matters to be adjudicated, the Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 2/8/2024. ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT: by LeAnna R. Wilson, District Court Clerk.(BJL) *Mailed Corey Lee Moore 533419 WHITEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PO BOX 679 WHITEVILLE, TN 38075
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Because it is apparent from Petitioner's application and supporting documents that he lacks the financial resources to pay the filing fee without undue hardship, his motion [Doc. #4 ] is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Petitioner's ability to file another federal habeas petition after his state-court remedies have been exhausted. As reasonable jurists would not debate the Courts procedural ruling, a COA is DENIED. AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT ORDER WILL ISSUE. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 2/8/2024. (BJL)*Mailed to Corey Lee Moore 533419 WHITEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PO BOX 679 WHITEVILLE, TN 38075
February 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Corey Lee Moore. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(BJL)
February 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Miscellaneous Case 3:24-mc-00004-JRG-JEM Closed and opened as Civil Case 3:24-cv-00051, pursuant to #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Corey Lee Moore filed 2/7/2024. (BJL) Modified on 2/7/2024 (BJL).*Mailed to Corey Lee Moore 533419 WHITEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PO BOX 679 WHITEVILLE, TN 38075 Modified case data on 3/1/2024 (ADA).
January 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency (IFP) - The Court is in receipt of your complaint/petition. However, in order for this matter to proceed, you must either pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (copy mailed along with IFP forms to Corey Lee Moore 533419 WHITEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PO BOX 679 WHITEVILLE, TN 38075) (JBR)
January 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice Regarding Requirement to Notify Court of Change of Address (copy mailed to Corey Lee Moore 533419 WHITEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY PO BOX 679 WHITEVILLE, TN 38075) (JBR)
January 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Corey Lee Moore.(JBR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Leeds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Corey Lee Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Chance Leeds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?