Blehco 520, LLC et al v. The Timber Ridge Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Blehco 520, LLC, William Randolph Stinson, II and Ram Linga Reddy Dornala
Defendant: The Timber Ridge Group, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2024cv00145
Filed: March 28, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Crytzer
Referring Judge: Jill E McCook
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 3/28/2024. (AML)
March 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 3/28/2024. (AML)
March 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Katherine A Crytzer on 3/28/2024. (AML)
March 28, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The Timber Ridge Group, Inc. (AML)
March 28, 2024 Filing 3 Administrative Notice to Counsel #1 Complaint - Certificate of Diversity to be filed as a separate event : requirements due by 4/2/2024. (AML)
March 28, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE of Deficiency (PDF) re #1 Complaint Attachments (Civil Case Cover Sheet, Summons) (AML)
March 28, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Timber Ridge Group, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNEDC-5635428.), filed by Blehco 520, LLC, Ram Linga Reddy Dornala, William Randolph Stinson, II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Other Cover Sheet, #7 Summons, #8 Other Certificate of Citizenship)(Parker, James)
March 28, 2024 NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE Certificate of Corporate Interest as required by FRCP 7.1 by Blehco 520, LLC. (AML)
March 28, 2024 District Judge Katherine A Crytzer and Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook added. (AML)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blehco 520, LLC et al v. The Timber Ridge Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Blehco 520, LLC
Represented By: Mabern E Wall
Represented By: James Frederick Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Randolph Stinson, II
Represented By: Mabern E Wall
Represented By: James Frederick Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ram Linga Reddy Dornala
Represented By: Mabern E Wall
Represented By: James Frederick Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Timber Ridge Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?