Hennekam v. Capital One Bank (USA), National Association et al
| Shaun Hennekam |
| Capital One Bank (USA), National Association and Experian Information Solutions Inc |
| 3:2024cv00158 |
| April 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Jill E McCook |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 04/04/2024. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Depositions.Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 04/04/2024. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 04/04/2024. (CAT)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Capital One Bank (USA), National Association, Experian Information Solutions Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Capital One Bank) (CAT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Shaun Hennekam FCRA against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNEDC-5640954.), filed by Shaun Hennekam. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Summons Experian, #6 Summons Capital One, #7 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Other Credit Report)(Swan, Philip) |
| District Judge Thomas A Varlan and Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook added. (CAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
