Evans v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District Evans v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Evans v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Plaintiff:	Deborah H Evans
Defendant:	Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Case Number:	4:2008cv00066
Filed:	September 18, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County:	Warren
Presiding Judge:	William B Carter
Presiding Judge:	Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 15, 2010	Filing 20 ORDER: the Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Carter's 19 findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b). Accordingly, Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENI ED.Defendant's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Commissioner's denial of benefits is AFFIRMED and the instant action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 1/15/2010. (BJL) Modified on 1/15/2010 (BJL, ).***Copy of Order mailed to Richard Dorris. . Modified on 1/19/2010 to correct Magistrate Judge's name. (BJL, ).
November 16, 2009	Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Deborah H Evans, 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security Administration, Commissioner of. Signed by Magistrate Judge William B Carter on 11/16/09. (KFB, ). Copy of R & R mailed to Richard A. Dorris (KFB, ).

Date Filed

Document Text

January 15, 2010

Filing 20 ORDER: the Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Carter's 19 findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b). Accordingly, Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENI ED.Defendant's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Commissioner's denial of benefits is AFFIRMED and the instant action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 1/15/2010. (BJL) Modified on 1/15/2010 (BJL, ).***Copy of Order mailed to Richard Dorris. . Modified on 1/19/2010 to correct Magistrate Judge's name. (BJL, ).

November 16, 2009

Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Deborah H Evans, 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security Administration, Commissioner of. Signed by Magistrate Judge William B Carter on 11/16/09. (KFB, ). Copy of R & R mailed to Richard A. Dorris (KFB, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Evans v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah H Evans
Represented By:	Richard A Dorris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?