Jenkins v. Marvel et al
| Sharon Jenkins |
| Jeffrey Marvel, Marvel Clinic, P.C., The Center For Day Surgery, Inc., Penn Plastic Surgery of Tullahoma, PC, Vertrue, Inc. and My Choice Medical, Inc. |
| 4:2008cv00075 |
| October 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice Office |
| Coffee |
| Susan K Lee |
| Harry S Mattice |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendants' 95 Motion to Strike John Weeter, M.D. Motion to Strike is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART and Defendants' 90 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 12/15/2010. (BJL)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER: the Court finds that Plaintiff's noncompliance with the Tennessee statute does not warrant a dismissal of these Defendants. Therefore, Defendants Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Based on the Memorandum and Order herein, the Court ORDERS the following: Defendant Vertrue, Inc.'s 30 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Defendant My Choice Medical, Inc.'s 32 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and Defendants Jeffrey Marvel, M.D., Marvel Clinic, P.C., Penn Plastic Surgery of Tullahoma, P.C., and The Center for Day Surgery, Inc.'s 40 Supplemental Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 1/14/2010. (BJL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
