Smith v. Calsonickansei North America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Janie Smith
Defendant: Calsonickansei North America, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2009cv00024
Filed: March 3, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Bedford
Presiding Judge: Susan K Lee
Presiding Judge: Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER finding as moot 18 Motion to limit the scope of discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 5/14/10. (GRE, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Calsonickansei North America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janie Smith
Represented By: Donald D Zuccarello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Calsonickansei North America, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew C Lonergan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?