Doe et al v. University Of The South
John Doe, Mary Doe and James Doe |
The University of the South |
4:2009cv00062 |
June 3, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Winchester Office |
Franklin |
Susan K Lee |
Harry S Mattice |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 139 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 77 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 78 Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal; granting 88 Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal; denying 92 Motion for Leave to File Document. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 3/31/11. (GRE, ) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting 48 Motion for Issuance of Order Pursuant to FERPA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 2/8/10. (GRE, ) |
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons explained herein, Defendant's 10 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Counts III and IV of Plaintiffs' Complaint are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs James Doe and Mary Doe' ;s Contractual and Quasi-Contractual Claims against the University [Counts I, II, XII] are also DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The University's Objection to United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee's 21 Memorandum and Order granting Plaintiffs' 25 Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonyms and for Protective Order is OVERRULED. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 10/13/2009. (BJL ) Modified on 10/13/2009 (BJL, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.