Ferrick v. Winchester Police Department, et al
Shawn Patrick Ferrick |
Winchester Police Department, Franklin County Sheriffs Department and James D Hodges |
4:2012cv00029 |
May 2, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Winchester Office |
Franklin |
William B Carter |
Harry S Mattice |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM: Accordingly, all claims against Inmate Hodges will be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim as Inmate Hodges is not a state actor for purposes of section 1983. Plaintiff's complaint will be DISMISSED sua sponte in its entirety for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. 28 U.C.S. sections 1915A and 19159(e) (Doc. 1). In addition, his motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART (Doc.3). The Clerk of Court will be DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum and Judgment to the Warden and Custodian of Records at Lexington Federal Medical Center and the Commissioner of the Bureau of Prisons to ensure the custodian of Plaintiff's inmate trust account complies with the portion of the Prison Litigation Reform Act relating to payment of the filing fee. An appropriate order will enter. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 7/29/2015. (DJH, ) Modified on 7/29/2015 (DJH, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.