Maher v. Bedford County Sheriff Department

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Eastern District Maher v. Bedford County Sheriff Department

Maher v. Bedford County Sheriff Department

Plaintiff:	Robert W. Maher, Jr.
Defendant:	Bedford County Sheriff Department
Case Number:	4:2016cv00021
Filed:	March 22, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office:	Winchester Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Susan K Lee
Presiding Judge:	Thomas A Varlan
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 20, 2017	Filing 45 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to open separate cases 42 , which will be DENIED for the reasons set forth. Plaintiff is again NOTIFIED that the Court will not look favorably upon any future m otions for post-judgment relief and/or evidentiary submissions based upon the same allegations as those Plaintiff has already set forth. This notification also applies to evidence that Plaintiff could have previously set forth. Plaintiff is also N OTIFIED that information regarding the status of Plaintiff's injuries and/or past medical events are not grounds for relief from the final judgment in this matter, and the Court will not look favorably upon any future motions seeking relief based thereon.Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 11/20/17. (copy mailed to Robert Maher at Hardeman County Correctional) (ADA)
September 16, 2016	Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 9/16/16. (c/m)(ABF)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 20, 2017

Filing 45 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to open separate cases 42 , which will be DENIED for the reasons set forth. Plaintiff is again NOTIFIED that the Court will not look favorably upon any future m otions for post-judgment relief and/or evidentiary submissions based upon the same allegations as those Plaintiff has already set forth. This notification also applies to evidence that Plaintiff could have previously set forth. Plaintiff is also N OTIFIED that information regarding the status of Plaintiff's injuries and/or past medical events are not grounds for relief from the final judgment in this matter, and the Court will not look favorably upon any future motions seeking relief based thereon.Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A. Varlan on 11/20/17. (copy mailed to Robert Maher at Hardeman County Correctional) (ADA)

September 16, 2016

Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 9/16/16. (c/m)(ABF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maher v. Bedford County Sheriff Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert W. Maher, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bedford County Sheriff Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?