Aguilera v. Shedd
Plaintiff: Cae Aguilera
Defendant: f/n/u Shedd
Case Number: 4:2017cv00029
Filed: June 9, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Winchester Office
County: Coffee
Presiding Judge: Susan K Lee
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiffs claim against Defendant Shedd inhis original complaint will be SEVERED from this action pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 6/9/2017. (AML, ) Copy of Order,, IFP for new separate case against Defendant Shedd, form 1983 complaint and IFP for separate complaint mailed to Plaintiff.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aguilera v. Shedd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cae Aguilera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: f/n/u Shedd
Represented By: Darrell G Townsend
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?