Robinson v. Price et al (GPR)
| Ephriam Bartholomew Robinson |
| Sabrina Price, Tim Lockey and Austin Swing |
| 4:2017cv00069 |
| November 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Winchester Office |
| Bedford |
| Susan K Lee |
| Thomas A Varlan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION to be set forth more fully in the following order. Signed by District Judge Thomas A Varlan on August 5, 2019. (copy mailed to Ephriam Bartholomew Robinson, 505 Shoma Drive, Shelbyville, TN 37160) (AYB)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court is in receipt of a pro se prisoners complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 2 and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 1 . It appears from the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 1 that Plaintiff lacks sufficient financial resources to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this motion 1 will be GRANTED. Because Plaintiff is an inmate in the Bedford County Jail, he will be ASSESSED th e civil filing fee of $350.00. The custodian of Plaintiff's inmate trust account will be directed to submit payments as set forth. Signed by Chief District Judge Thomas A Varlan on 1/10/19. (c/m to Ephriam Bartholomew Robinson 494 George Fraley Parkway Winchester, TN 37398, custodian of Plaintiffs inmate trust account and Courts financial deputy) (ADA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
