Carlton v. Lokey et al
| Allan Blake Carlton |
| Tim Lokey, Austin Swing, Mary West, Jennifer Little and Southern Health Group |
| 4:2018cv00003 |
| February 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Winchester Office |
| Bedford |
| Thomas W Phillips |
| Christopher H Steger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION as set forth in following order. Signed by District Judge Thomas W Phillips on 3/27/19. (c/m to Allan Blake Carlton, BEDFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 210 North Spring Street, Shelbyville, TN 37160)(ABF)
|
|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: It appears from the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 1 that Plaintiff lacks sufficient financial resources to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this motion 1 w ill be GRANTED. Because Plaintiff is an inmate in the Bedford County Correctional Facility, he will be ASSESSED the civil filing fee of $350.00. The custodian of Plaintiff's inmate trust account will be directed to submit payments as se t forth. Signed by District Judge Thomas W. Phillips on 1/10/19. (cc Allan Blake Carlton BEDFORD COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 210 North Spring Street Shelbyville, TN 37160, custodian of inmate accounts and the Court's financial deputy)(ADA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
