Hedelsky v. USA
James Hedelsky |
USA |
4:2018cv00051 |
August 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Winchester Office |
Coffee |
Travis R McDonough |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court concludes that an evidentiary hearing is unnecessary, and Petitioners Section 2255 motion (Doc. 1 in Case No. 4:18-cv- 51; Doc. 169 in Case No. 4:15-cr-13) is DENIED. AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT WILL ENTER. Signed by District Judge Travis R McDonough on 1/23/2020. (AWS) Mailed to to James Hedelsky. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hedelsky v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: James Hedelsky | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.