Limbaugh et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated (JRG3)
| Jo Carolyn Limbaugh and Danny L. Limbaugh, Sr. |
| Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated |
| 4:2018cv00061 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| J Ronnie Greer |
| Susan K Lee |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER denied as moot #11 Motion to Dismiss. On October 26, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), [Doc. 10]. As required by the cited Rule, the stipulation was signed by all parties that had appeared in this lawsuit. In accordance with the parties' stipulation, the case was closed. Now before the Court is the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), [Doc. 11], requesting the Court for the issuance of an order allowing [plaintiffs] to dismiss this matter voluntarily, without prejudice. As the plaintiffs have already voluntarily dismissed this matter without prejudice, see [Doc. 10], the plaintiffs' motion is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 10/30/2018. (CAT)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Danny L. Limbaugh, Sr, Jo Carolyn Limbaugh. (Attachments: #1 Order)(McBee, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal Case by Danny L. Limbaugh, Sr, Jo Carolyn Limbaugh. (McBee, Thomas) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Generally, scheduling orders will be entered by the Court in lieu of in-person or telephonic scheduling conferences unless otherwise requested by the parties. It is therefore ORDERED: As soon as practicable, but in no event later than 30 days from the first appearance of a defendant, or if that has already occurred, within 30 days of this order, the parties must confer, in a conference arranged by plaintiffs' counsel, for the purpose of considering the nature and basis of their claims and defenses. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 10/09/2018. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 10/9/18. (Attachments: #1 Other Notice of Consent/Non-Consent) (aws, )
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated.(de Quesada, Maria) |
| Filing 6 **INFORMATIONAL ONLY** Administrative Notice to Counsel re: Civil Cover Sheet. (CNC, ) |
|
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 10/4/18. (JBR)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 10/4/18. (JBR)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 10/4/18. (JBR)
|
| Filing 2 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated d/b/a Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (de Quesada, Maria) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Lincoln County Circuit Court, case number 18-CV-81. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0649-3785591), filed by Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated d/b/a Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Summons, #2 Exhibit B-Complaint, #3 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Other Notice of Filing Notice of Removal with State Court)(de Quesada, Maria) |
| District Judge J Ronnie Greer and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (JBR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
