Cretacci v. Hare et al
Blake Cretacci |
Coffee County, Tennessee, Cody Duke, Matthew Hare, Joshua Henry Thomas, Steven Austin Qualls and Tristan Collins |
4:2019cv00055 |
August 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
Susan K Lee |
Harry S Mattice |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall have up to and including October 17, 2019, to file answers in this cause. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 10/4/2019. (BDG) |
Filing 18 ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 10/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent/ Notice of Non-Consent) (BDG) |
Filing 17 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Coffee County, Tennessee, Tristan Collins, Cody Duke, Matthew Hare, Steven Austin Qualls, Joshua Henry Thomas. (Elliott, Stephen) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen W Elliott on behalf of Cody Duke, Steven Austin Qualls, Joshua Henry Thomas (Elliott, Stephen) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey R Thompson on behalf of Coffee County, Tennessee (Thompson, Jeffrey) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen W Elliott on behalf of Tristan Collins, Matthew Hare (Elliott, Stephen) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed Joshua Henry Thomas served on 9/9/2019. (BDG) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed Steven Austin Qualls served on 9/9/2019. (BDG) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed Tristan Collins served on 9/9/2019. (BDG) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed Matthew Hare served on 9/9/2019. (BDG) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed Coffee County, Tennessee served on 9/9/2019. (BDG) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Cody Duke served on 9/9/2019. (BDG) |
Doc #4 in addition to doc #7 forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. (BDG) |
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to #4 Summons Issued Marshal forms by Blake Cretacci. (Attachments: #1 Other Marshal form COLLINS, #2 Other Marshal form DUKE, #3 Other Marshal form HARE, #4 Other Marshal form QUALLS, #5 Other Marshal form THOMAS)(Justice, Paul) |
Summons Returned Unexecuted as to All Defendants. Missing USM-285 Form. (BDG) |
Filing 6 Administrative Notice to Counsel #4 Summons Issued : Please file copies of the USM-285 form so the USMS can process the summons. requirements due by 9/3/2019. (BDG) |
Filing 5 NOTICE re IFP Service re #4 Summons Issued (BDG) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Coffee County, Tennessee, Tristan Collins, Cody Duke, Matthew Hare, Steven Austin Qualls, Joshua Henry Thomas. (BDG)Summonses forwarded to the U.S. Marshal for service. |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr on 8/22/2019. (BDG) Order mailed to Sheriff of Coffee County, Tennessee. Serviced to financial deputy via ECF. |
District Judge Harry S Mattice, Jr and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (SAC) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Blake Cretacci. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Inmate Trust Account Statement)(Justice, Paul) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Blake Cretacci. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil cover sheet, #2 Summons Hare, #3 Summons Collins, #4 Summons Qualls, #5 Summons Thomas, #6 Summons Duke, #7 Summons Coffee County)(Justice, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.