Harrod v. Lee et al
| Landon Harrod |
| Kenya Lee, Rocky Ruehling, Coffee County, Tennessee and City of Tullahoma, Tennessee |
| 4:2021cv00039 |
| September 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Charles E Atchley |
| Christopher H Steger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for good cause shown. The Clerk of Court shall issue any necessary service packets. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger on 9-9-21. This entry is the Order of the Court. There is no document attached. (KMG)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 9/8/2021. (JCK)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 9/8/2021. (JCK)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 9/8/2021. (JCK)
|
|
District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr and Magistrate Judge Christopher H Steger added. (JCK)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Landon Harrod. (Justice, Paul)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City of Tullahoma, Tennessee, Coffee County, Tennessee, Kenya Lee, Rocky Ruehling, filed by Landon Harrod. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet)(Justice, Paul)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
