Staton v. United States Postal Service (JRG3)
| Rebecca Valadez Staton and Rebecca Staton |
| United States Postal Service |
| 4:2023cv00037 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| J Ronnie Greer |
| Susan K Lee |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to United States Postal Service, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons United States Postal Service U.S. Attorney, #2 Summons United States Postal Service Attorney General) (CAT) |
Filing 4
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 09/26/2023. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 09/26/2023. (CAT)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 09/26/2023. (CAT)
|
| District Judge J Ronnie Greer and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (CAT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Postal Service ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-5483277.), filed by Rebecca Valadez Staton. (Attachments: #1 Other Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons USPO Bedford Cty at Shelbyville, #3 Summons USPO U.S. ATTY at Knoxville, #4 Summons USPO U.S. ATTY GEN'L at Washington DC)(Thomas, D) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
