Reed et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
| Symantha Reed, Charles Goetz, James Spaulding, Wendy Wharton, Gary Crawford and Robbie Johnson |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. |
| 4:2023cv00051 |
| November 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
| Charles E Atchley |
| Susan K Lee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Tyson Foods, Inc.. (Grisham, J.) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF NONCONSENT by Tyson Foods, Inc. (Grisham, J.) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Gary Crawford, Charles Goetz, Robbie Johnson, Symantha Reed, James Spaulding, Wendy Wharton. (Barnes, Robert) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #14 MOTION to Stay re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Tyson Foods, Inc.. (Grisham, J.) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Stay re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Tyson Foods, Inc.. (Grisham, J.) |
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Grisham, J.) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM to extent briefing schedule 14 days by All Plaintiffs. (Barnes, Robert) |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Corporate Interest by Tyson Foods, Inc.. (Grisham, J.) |
Filing 10
ORDER. The parties are hereby ORDERED to confer and develop a discovery plan in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). The parties discovery plan must comply in all material respects with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3). The parties must file a written report outlining the discovery plan no later than 21 days from the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr. on 12/6/2023. (AML)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Tyson Foods, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Grisham, J.) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The parties are ordered to confer and return the attached form within the time provided.Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on November 30, 2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent/Non-Consent Form(flatten/non-fillable when filing in ECF)) (SAC)
|
| Filing 7 Administrative Notice to Counsel #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM : requirements due by 12/1/2023. (SAC) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Tyson Foods, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Other Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Exhibit, #3 Other Notice of Compliance)(Grisham, J.) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT (Civil Cover Sheet) by Tyson Foods, Inc.. (Grisham, J.) |
|
Filing 4
Order Governing Sealing Confidential Information. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 11/27/23. (ABF)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Governing Motions To Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 11/27/23. (ABF)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Governing Depositions. Signed by District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr on 11/27/23. (ABF)
|
| District Judge Charles E Atchley, Jr and Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee added. (ABF) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Coffee County Chancery Court, case number 23CV-396. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNEDC-5530007), filed by Tyson Foods, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(Grisham, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
