Mosley v. Fortner

Mosley v. Fortner

Petitioner:	Bobby James Mosley, Jr.
Respondent:	James Fortner
Case Number:	1:2008cv00013
Filed:	February 22, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office:	Columbia Office
County:	Marshall
Presiding Judge:	Robert Echols
Presiding Judge:	Juliet E. Griffin
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 29, 2009	Filing 31 ORDER: Report and Recommendations 28 is Accepted and Approved. Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation as set forth in his Motion for Review 30 are hereby Overruled. This case is hereby Dismissed With Prejudice. A Certifica te of Appealability will not issue because Petitioner cannot demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the Court erred in determining that Petitioner has procedurally defaulted on his claims and/or that his claims lack merit. Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 8/29/09. (cc: petitioner by reg. & cert. mail)(dt)
July 7, 2009	Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Griffin Recommends that the Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief 1 be DENIED and that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 7/7/09. (cc: Petitioner by reg. & cert. mail)(dt)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 29, 2009

Filing 31 ORDER: Report and Recommendations 28 is Accepted and Approved. Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation as set forth in his Motion for Review 30 are hereby Overruled. This case is hereby Dismissed With Prejudice. A Certifica te of Appealability will not issue because Petitioner cannot demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the Court erred in determining that Petitioner has procedurally defaulted on his claims and/or that his claims lack merit. Entry of this Order on the docket shall constitute entry of final judgment in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79(a). Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 8/29/09. (cc: petitioner by reg. & cert. mail)(dt)

July 7, 2009

Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Griffin Recommends that the Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief 1 be DENIED and that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 7/7/09. (cc: Petitioner by reg. & cert. mail)(dt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mosley v. Fortner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Bobby James Mosley, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: James Fortner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?