Vanrooyen v. Wipro Gallagher Solutions, Inc. et al
| Tamara L. Vanrooyen |
| Wipro Gallagher Solutions, Inc. and Prasad Gantasi |
| 1:2009cv00005 |
| January 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Marshall |
| Joe Brown |
| Robert Echols |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER: For the reasons explained in the Memorandum issued contemporaneously herewith, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 21 is hereby GRANTED and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Defendants in a separate document in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Signed by Senior Judge Robert Echols on 7/30/10. (dt)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER: Discovery may remain open until 5/7/2010. Dispositive Motions shall be due 5/28/2010, and responses thereto shall be 6/28/2010. Replies, if any, limited five pages, shall be due 7/2/2010. The parties are directed to contact the Magistrate Judge's office to schedule a telephone conference if further difficulties are encountered in completing the necessary depositions within the revised time schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 4/20/10. (dt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
