Heathcoat v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
Luther Heathcoat |
Tennessee Department of Correction, Correction Corporation of America, George Little, Cherry Lindamood, Lawrence Maples and Jesse James |
1:2009cv00084 |
November 23, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Columbia Office |
Marshall |
Joe Brown |
Aleta A. Trauger |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 51 is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants George Little a nd Tennessee Department of Correction 37 is GRANTED, and all claims against these two defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The claims against all other defendants having previously been dismissed, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk shall CLOSE this file. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 6/14/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (dt) |
Filing 48 ORDER: That Danny Ray Meeks' Motion to Withdraw His Motion For Leave to Intervene 46 is GRANTED. The Clerk shall TERM the Report and Recommendation 34 as MOOT. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/12/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.