Calahan v. Patterson et al
Plaintiff: Kerry Calahan
Defendant: Sabrina Patterson and Joann Sellers
Case Number: 1:2010cv00018
Filed: March 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Office: Columbia Office
Presiding Judge: Todd J. Campbell
Presiding Judge: Juliet E. Griffin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER: Accordingly, the Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 49 is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administra tive remedies. Any other pending Motions are denied as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/2/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
April 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 55 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons set out, the Court RECOMMENDS that the Motion for Summary Judgment 49 filed by Defendants Sabrina Patterson and Joann Sellers, be GRANTED on the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies and that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/11/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
January 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER: The Defendants are given 14 days from entry of this Order to file a memorandum and any other appropriate filings in support of the motion to dismiss. The Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the Defendants' supplemental filing to file a resp onse to the motion. Alternatively, the Defendants may file a notice withdrawing the motion to dismiss with leave to file a more complete and proper dispositive motion prior to the 2/14/2011, deadline forthe filing of dispositive motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/25/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
April 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re 8 Motion to combine cases; Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Plaintiff's request to combine the two cases so that he will not be assessed two filing fees is DENIED. The Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 4/28/10. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calahan v. Patterson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kerry Calahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sabrina Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joann Sellers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?